Today, The Washington Post published an article titled "ChatGPT is little help for doctors in diagnosing diseases, study finds."
Yesterday, ChatGPT couldn't give me the name of a movie about a one-armed baseball player.
The fact that it couldn't give me the correct answer wasn't concerning, but the frequency in which it gave incorrect answers, the absolute confidence in which they did so, and the fabricated synopses for the movies they gave, was. While my example might be a little ridiculous, the WaPo article was enough for my eyes to pop out a little, considering here at Interactually, we only trust AI to perform some limited digital marketing tasks, where the stakes are quite a bit lower than medical diagnoses.
